![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjEuFmxIXqr_s9xNcTFLMWqA9kvHgbQv2ard3_sS9PepZqCjABRQBd8nGUkm8S5myfWJI2M2QZRJMcphi_9uQP1kYOoNQP_0kPOp9KXokQwZvpJnacaIqsQSGprSEIwv3r10_rFAMi5iFFp/s200/Economist-thumb.jpg)
The TV is staring at me blankly from the corner. I have no need to be entranced by some entertainment. I've heard the same news three times. I look forward to pulling apart the plastic wrapper around the Economist and finding an intelligent article. There was one last week about evolution which I found really interesting. It raised the possibility that the outcome of evolution is narrowly constrained even if governed by random processes. Thus two quite different animals can end up looking similar over time because they inhabit identical ecological niches. Dogs and dingos. Deer and kangaroos. This is hardly a new idea, but appears to be emerging as respectable in the scientific world which otherwise is wary of anything redolent of intelligent design.
No comments:
Post a Comment